Steven A. Rigolosi
Auteur van The Outsmarting of Criminals: A Mystery Introducing Miss Felicity Prim
Over de Auteur
Reeksen
Werken van Steven A. Rigolosi
Tagged
Algemene kennis
Er zijn nog geen Algemene Kennis-gegevens over deze auteur. Je kunt helpen.
Leden
Besprekingen
Statistieken
- Werken
- 7
- Leden
- 97
- Populariteit
- #194,532
- Waardering
- 3.4
- Besprekingen
- 12
- ISBNs
- 10
RATING: R (Violence, Gore, Sexual themes)
Trigger Warnings:
I'll be blunt: The characters don't have any emotional investment in what's going on, so it's hard for me to. It was also hard to keep the 1700's characters distinct in my mind when they are never described and have no real personalities. Like if a Shakespeare play had no dialogue in it and you couldn't see the actors. So we have these empty names (that became forgettable and interchangeable in my mind) experiencing gruesome, graphic, paranormal, supernatural, and to their eyes surely Satanic occurrences/rituals/desecrations happening in front of them, and scarcely a word is said about an emotional reaction! A long-dead character materializes in a chair opposite a living character who was alone just prior, speaks to the character, and they just respond, it's like it didn't even register. That's not really what I hoped horror would be (somewhat new to the genre).
Then, this kind of narration, with hardly any reactions or responses from anyone, would be interrupted by immersion-breaking phrasing like "the ass-end of the restaurant" in the narration. That's right -- it wouldn't be said or thought by a character. Such as:
The ass-end!
The following whole paragraph is symptomatic:
Plot devices are parenthetically explained the first time they're introduced--removing the meaning from them--instead of SHOWING us and leading us through the past events as part of the story that made them meaningful in the present. For example, we just find out 'oh yeah one time this item was cursed, by a witch character you've never heard of and that's why his daughter cried when she handed it to him'...", etc.
At times I remarked on the seemingly emotionless characters. No time is spent on reactions or emotional responses: "Oh, a strange man just handed me a
Not a whole lot is left as a surprise... And doesn't let any of the horror elements linger at all. They're always just over and done with in a flash. And plot elements with a TON of potential (like when
About 20% of the way through the book,
I also noticed that no real motivations or psychic connections are made, and the characters are a little one-dimensional. Also, there's no sense of progression,
I don't think I was the target audience for this book, but I was grateful halfway through as things started to be told to the reader. A lot of open threads with no real connection to anything kept happening and it would register no reaction. A good example is half a dozen instances where Matthew (mmc) hears gunshots and still behaves as if he didn't hear them.
Gunshots? This is introduced just like this. What gunshots are these? Is this nothing strange? Couldn't the characters say something (e.g. "hey um I just came to visit you and I'm sleeping over, were those gunshots?") There just wasn't enough context for this. Eventually I figured out it must have been hunters? Potentially
All in all it hasn't turned me off the horror genre altogether. In the end, it really wasn't what the front cover and title evoke. Not at all a typical ghost-haunts-house story.
And this book really couldn't ever survive a screen adaptation--
I won this book on LibraryThing as an Early Reviewer. It took me several years to get through it all and put this to paper; I hope it means I can now win more books to review.… (meer)