Klik op een omslag om naar Google Boeken te gaan.
Bezig met laden... Alchemist of the Golden Dawn: The Letters of the Revd W.A. Ayton to F.L. Gardner and Others, 1886-1905 (1985)door W. A. Ayton
Geen Bezig met laden...
Meld je aan bij LibraryThing om erachter te komen of je dit boek goed zult vinden. Op dit moment geen Discussie gesprekken over dit boek. geen besprekingen | voeg een bespreking toe
Onderdeel van de reeks(en)Roots of the Golden Dawn (1985)
Geen bibliotheekbeschrijvingen gevonden. |
Actuele discussiesGeen
Google Books — Bezig met laden... GenresDewey Decimale Classificatie (DDC)135.40924Philosophy and Psychology Parapsychology And Occultism Dreams And Mysticism Mysticism ; Esoteric traditionsLC-classificatieWaarderingGemiddelde:
Ben jij dit?Word een LibraryThing Auteur. |
Ayton's principal esoteric interest was alchemy, and much of the correspondence is concerned with the lending and copying of secret manuscripts on this topic. The interest was not confined to armchair study, however, and Howe reports that the Reverend Ayton maintained a laboratory in the basement of the vicarage (to avoid detection by the bishop!). There are secondary accounts provided from W.B. Yeats that Ayton had lost to inefficient storage a supply of the Elixir of Life (11), and later "made what he hopes is the Elixir of Life. If the rabbit on whom he is trying it survives, we are all to drink a noggin full -- at least those of us whose longevity he feels he could encourage" (109).
Throughout Ayton's letters to Gardner, there are anxious and adverse references to the B.B., which is evidently the "Black Brotherhood." Howe is convinced, and repeatedly informs the reader, that "B.B." refers to the Jesuits, and it may be that denotation that Ayton had in mind. However, I consider it something of an open question on the evidence supplied in the volume. Granted, Atyon is otherwise worried about "Papists," and his 1904 and 1905 letters refer simply to the ill influence of "Jesuits," without mentioning B.B. Still, the Jesuits could be subservient to a larger B.B., as they certainly are in some conceptions of esoteric politics. At the end of 1892, Ayton wrote to Gardner, "I congratulate you on obtaining the valuable work on B.B. Do not think I underestimate getting knowledge about their doings ... They are plotting all the time" (73).
Howe is notable for a lack of sympathy to the objects of his study, frequently deriding their interests and engagements. The fact that he "cannot fathom" the reasons that Bulwer-Lytton's Zanoni was attractive to 19th-century English occultists shows his singular lack of imagination. There also is a peculiar almost-apology in response to Gerald Suster, whose contribution to the Falcon Press What You Should Know about the Golden Dawn was a rebuke to Howe regarding the value of magical practice (80). He has done a fine job of collecting these primary materials, in any case, and anyone with an interest in Victorian occultism can profit by this quick and entertaining read.