This comic formatted book uses dare-devil ducks to discuss geometry shapes and terms in a fun and clever way. This book touches on the subjects such as relative positions, composing simple shapes to form larger shapes, and partitioning rectangles into two and four equal shares. This creative book can be used in a kindergarten class before a math lesson on those certain topics. ( )

This book was very enjoyable, it was easy to read, and very animated as a comic book. The Wing Wing Brothers uses different tricks to help students understand geometry. ( )

This book is full of shapes. The level of geometry is very simple. The story is about a group of ducks performing at a palooza. It uses geometry for a young audience starting with positions such as aside, above, and below. This story also uses simple shapes and combines them to make larger shapes such as squares that turn into rectangles and triangles that turn into diamonds. There are very few words giving the audience more a change to focus on the pictures and shapes. It also teaches adding shapes and taking away. ( )

The daredevil Wing Wing Brothers explain 3 different CCSS geometry concepts: relative positions, composing simple shapes to form larger shapes, and partitioning rectangles into two and four equal shapes. Learning geometry is made fun through the humorous antics of the Wing Wing Brothers and the comic book style illustrations. Readers will definitely be left imagining what other crazy stunts the brothers will attempt. ( )

This book is cute and humorous, and would be most appropriate for children in about the first grade. I'm sure that very young children would really enjoy this silly book, and it could help to reinforce the basic geometric principles that students learn about between kindergarten and second grade, such as what a trapezoid looks like or what "half" is. That being said, I didn't find this book to be exceptionally instructional. The book is split into three parts, each of which explores a different concept. I think it might have been better, however, if the author had instead devoted the entire book to a single concept and explored that concept more thoroughly. The book as it is is okay, but I'm not sure how much children would learn from it. ( )