Klik op een omslag om naar Google Boeken te gaan.
Bezig met laden... Measuring Manhood: Race and the Science of Masculinity, 1830–1934door Melissa N. Stein
Geen Bezig met laden...
Meld je aan bij LibraryThing om erachter te komen of je dit boek goed zult vinden. Op dit moment geen Discussie gesprekken over dit boek. geen besprekingen | voeg een bespreking toe
"From the 'gay gene' to the 'female brain' and African American students' insufficient 'hereditary background' for higher education, arguments about a biological basis for human difference have reemerged in the twenty-first century. Measuring Manhood shows where they got their start. Melissa N. Stein analyzes how race became the purview of science in nineteenth- and early twentieth-century America and how it was constructed as a biological phenomenon with far-reaching social, cultural, and political resonances. She tells of scientific 'experts' who advised the nation on its most pressing issues and exposes their use of gender and sex differences to conceptualize or buttress their claims about racial difference. Stein examines the works of scientists and scholars from medicine, biology, ethnology, and other fields to trace how their conclusions about human difference did no less than to legitimize sociopolitical hierarchy in the United States. Covering a wide range of historical actors from Samuel Morton, the infamous collector and measurer of skulls in the 1830s, to NAACP leader and antilynching activist Walter White in the 1930s, this book reveals the role of gender, sex, and sexuality in the scientific making--and unmaking--of race"-- Geen bibliotheekbeschrijvingen gevonden. |
Actuele discussiesGeen
Google Books — Bezig met laden... GenresDewey Decimale Classificatie (DDC)305.31097309034Social sciences Social Sciences; Sociology and anthropology Groups of people People by gender or sex Men History, geographic treatment, biography North America United StatesLC-classificatieWaarderingGemiddelde:
Ben jij dit?Word een LibraryThing Auteur. |
Of the long nineteenth century, Stein writes, “Especially in its discussion of gender, nineteenth-century scientific thought about race changed over time, revising itself to meet the ideological needs of a nation divided first over slavery and later over the status that blacks would occupy as free people” (pg. 29). During this long period, “As the nation stood on the brink of war, what was at stake in ethnological defenses of slavery such as [John] Van Evrie’s had intensified and changed; it now included the question of who could fully exercise ‘manhood rights’ if slavery were to disappear” (pg. 91). This led physicians to obsess over the proper roles of manhood and womanhood, both inextricably tied to the hierarchy of race. Recalling Gerald Linderman’s thesis in Embattled Courage, Stein argues, “Manhood was central to social and political concerns that preoccupied Americans during the Civil War” (pg. 104). Following the Civil War, “the emergence of the ‘black beast’ and racial scientists’ growing interest in sexuality more generally in the late nineteenth century was precipitated by several factors in American politics, culture, and science” (pg. 148). New theories of sexuality, particularly a focus on homosexuality, inversion, and hermaphrodites dominated the discourse surrounding gender in America. Stein writes, “In the context of evolutionary theory’s growing popularity in the United States, sexuality and sexual instincts joined sex and gender as markers of racial difference in late nineteenth-century racial science” (pg. 167). This led white scientists to claim, “The ‘lower races’ deviated from white norms of gender roles, reproductive anatomy, and sexual behavior. Predictably, when these same medical scientists turned their attention to gender or sexual variance, they often read these differences through the lens of race,” further demonstrating the intertwined nature of the two (pg. 170). In order to control what people perceived as sexual deviancy, some white scientists advocated castration as an alternative to lynching. This desire to modify genitalia in order to facilitate proper sexuality also helped popularize circumcision. Stein writes, “From the late nineteenth century through the 1920s, emasculation was central to scientific and popular discussions of lynching, the brutal practice itself, and racial scientists’ proposed medio-legal alternatives to mob violence” (pg. 219). In all cases, sex and gender co-existed on an axis in the American mind. Stein concludes, “In a society where social and political institutions were structured around binaries, it was the spaces in between that fascinated and loomed most dangerous to scientists” (pg. 172). ( )