Klik op een omslag om naar Google Boeken te gaan.
Bezig met laden... The Book of Signs (1930)door Rudolf Koch
Geen Bezig met laden...
Meld je aan bij LibraryThing om erachter te komen of je dit boek goed zult vinden. Op dit moment geen Discussie gesprekken over dit boek. A book of symbols, explained by one Rudolf Koch and illustrated with woodblock prints by one Fritz Kredel. The translation into English is done by Vyvyan Holland, the son of Oscar Wilde, which makes it a strange peice to have. The font is also by Kredel, and not a user friendly type. The capital A's are odd, and it takes awhile for you to train yourself on all the letter shapes. The symbols are split into various sections, and the text is quite informative, though sometimes a tad mystical. Good set of Christian monograms—a whole section on Christograms. Good sections on alchemical symbols, astrological symbols, and runes. A decent reference work and quick read. Odd bit of trivia with this book, it is the book that the band Led Zeppelin got some of their symbols out of for the untitled fourth album. Excellent book, beuatifully rendered. Translated from German by Vyvyan Holland, Oscar Wilde's son. Excellent summary of many common symbol systems, beautifully illustrated with woodblock prints by Fritz Kredel. This English edition dates from 1930. This book was a great source of joy during my childhood.--AMK geen besprekingen | voeg een bespreking toe
Onderdeel van de uitgeversreeks(en)
Famed German type designer renders 493 symbols: religious, alchemical, imperial, runes, property marks, etc. Timeless. Geen bibliotheekbeschrijvingen gevonden. |
Actuele discussiesGeenPopulaire omslagen
Google Books — Bezig met laden... GenresDewey Decimale Classificatie (DDC)652Technology Management and auxiliary services Writing: Materials, TypewritersLC-classificatieWaarderingGemiddelde:
Ben jij dit?Word een LibraryThing Auteur. |
It's mostly filled with Christian and European and Middle East sources. Nothing from Asia, Oceana, the Americas. It has a patriarchal, religious slant, and I don't know how it stands up to contemporary interpretation of symbol meanings.
Still, I've thumbed through it many times with pleasure and curiosity. ( )