Klik op een omslag om naar Google Boeken te gaan.
Bezig met laden... Metaphysicsdoor Theophrastus
Geen Bezig met laden...
Meld je aan bij LibraryThing om erachter te komen of je dit boek goed zult vinden. Op dit moment geen Discussie gesprekken over dit boek. geen besprekingen | voeg een bespreking toe
This book has been written from the conviction that general statements about the philosophical position taken by Theophrastus in this small but extremely difficult treatise, can only be made on the basis of a detailed interpretation of each and every sentence of the text. This resulted in a full commentary, which evades no philological or philosophical question that should be asked in order to elicit from the text a maximum of information. The outcome is a cautious but nonetheless explicit and determinate characterization and evaluation of Theophrastean metaphysics as a biologist's metaphysics, which deserves the attention of philosophers in its own right. The author has paid special attention to questions of Peripatetic idiom and terminology, thus increasing the value of this book to students of Peripatetic thought in general. The information brought together has been made easily accessible by full indexes. Geen bibliotheekbeschrijvingen gevonden. |
Actuele discussiesGeenPopulaire omslagen
Google Books — Bezig met laden... GenresDewey Decimale Classificatie (DDC)110Philosophy and Psychology Metaphysics MetaphysicsLC-classificatieWaarderingGemiddelde:
Ben jij dit?Word een LibraryThing Auteur. |
It is interesting that Theophrastus was not above questioning some of his master's views. He finds problems in both Plato's and Aristotle's systems when it comes to motion/movement (kinesis). With Aristotle he sees it as inconsistent that a first mover could set into motion bodies with disparate forms of motion, e.g. planets move differently. With Plato he finds it problematic that the forms could be both at rest and in motion apart from sensible reality.
Quite an interesting little work. I do intend to read some more of Theophrastus in the not too distant future. Many of his works are fragmentary, but he was an important figure in the tradition of Aristotelianism. ( )