Klik op een omslag om naar Google Boeken te gaan.
Bezig met laden... Utopia: Fact or Fiction? : The Evidence from the Americasdoor Lorainne G. Stobbart
Geen Bezig met laden...
Meld je aan bij LibraryThing om erachter te komen of je dit boek goed zult vinden. Op dit moment geen Discussie gesprekken over dit boek. geen besprekingen | voeg een bespreking toe
"At periodic intervals during historical or literary analysis a new theory arises that forces a re-evaluation of long-held opinions. That Utopia is factual not fictional is one such theory." "Perhaps because More's text was written before Mexico was 'officially' discovered no previous study of Utopia has attempted to establish a factual New World basis for this ideal state. Here, Lorainne Stobbart seeks to argue that the Maya of Central America provided that basis and, in doing so, she compels the reader to examine both the unquestioning acceptance of official historic dating and the possible motives and reasons for accepting Utopia as a fictional work for over four hundred and fifty years." "The author investigates the remarkably large number of features both societies shared, including similarities in local government, religion, social customs, trade and urban life, leading to the conclusion that More did, indeed, have access to information on Mayan life and culture." "Many scholars in both historical and literary circles may find themselves disagreeing with this controversial work, but they will, like future analysts, find it difficult to ignore."--BOOK JACKET.Title Summary field provided by Blackwell North America, Inc. All Rights Reserved Geen bibliotheekbeschrijvingen gevonden. |
Actuele discussiesGeen
Google Books — Bezig met laden... GenresDewey Decimale Classificatie (DDC)335.02Social sciences Economics Socialism and related systems Utopian systems and schoolsLC-classificatieWaarderingGemiddelde:
Ben jij dit?Word een LibraryThing Auteur. |
But he is not the only explorer. In 1499 a former captain of Columbus, Alonso de Ojeda, arrives on the Guyana coast. Searching for pearls he travels north to Venezuela ('little Venice'), while another member of the same expedition, the Italian Amerigo Vespucci, travels south to discover the mouth of the Amazon.
In 1502, Vespucci follows up earlier Portuguese expeditions and explores the coast of Brazil. In 1507 German geographers suggest that the new continent should be named after Amerigo Vespucci, who has written prolifically about his 'discovery' of what is now South America. Vespucci dies in 1512 and is buried in Florence.
It is now 1516. In England, Sir Thomas More publishes a book in Latin. He writes about a Portuguese who sailed with Vespucci and travelled widely in this New World. In particular, this Portuguese describes a land in which he had lived for more than five years. This land was originally a peninsula, not an island, but a channel was cut through the isthmus. There are 54 towns, regular in plan and sited at convenient distances apart. This civilisation has a distinctive political organisation, and its social customs (including population control and slavery), trade, warfare and religion are carefully described. Though this account is given sympathetically, it cannot really be said to be a description of an ideal society, either Platonic or Christian.
Stobbart's study claims to have identified this civilisation. The Mayan society, as we know from other scientific disciplines, shares most of the points noted in More's account. We know that the Yucatan peninsula of Mexico was believed to be an island for much of the 16th century, even appearing such on maps. A few Europeans are known to have lived there before Hernan Cortes' marauding expedition passed by in 1519 on its way to gold-rich central Mexico, there to destroy the Aztec Empire. But the Mayas were, for the time being, spared.
Now Utopia, the tradition goes, was a fiction from Thomas More's mind, an imaginary island where everything is perfect, all the better to contrast with contemporary European societies. And yet the title page of the first edition readily identifies itself as 'a really splendid little book, as entertaining as it is instructive'. Among More's jokes about the Utopians is the Portuguese traveller saying, 'I can't halp thinking they must be of Greek extraction, since their language, though otherwise more like Persian, contains some traces of Greek.' This explains the name Utopia, derived from Greek 'ou', not, and 'topos', place. Well, that's clear then. Utopia is Nowhere. The book is an elaborate pun, a successor to Plato's 'Republic', and forerunner of various science fiction scenarios.
But, seen with the innocent eye, it is possible to take, as Stobbart suggests, 'at face value More's claim in his letters and text that he was writing of an actual society in the New World.' Stobbart 'could see the similarities in some of the more obvious customs, such as the priestly feather-embroidered cloak. The only thing that puzzled me was which of the three advanced societies More was describing: the Inca, Aztec or Maya.'
In view of some of the difficulties scholars face in neatly pigeon-holing More's work (as philosophy or early SF, for example) this classically simple theory has much to commend it, and Stobbart offers some ideas on why More might have chosen to hide a mostly factual account under a fictional guise.
http://calmgrove.wordpress.com/2012/05/21/utopia/ ( )