Bezig met laden...

Your Movie Sucks (2007)

door Roger Ebert

Leden	Besprekingen	Populariteit	Gemiddelde beoordeling	Aanhalingen
300	5	87,552	(3.63)	20
Roger Ebert's I Hated Hated Hated This Movie, which gathered some of his most scathing reviews, was a best-seller. This new collection continues the tradition, reviewing not only movies that were at the bottom of the barrel, but also movies that he found underneath the barrel. From Roger's review of Deuce Bigalow: European Gigolo (0 stars): "The movie created a spot of controversy in February 2005. According to a story by Larry Carroll of MTV News, Rob Schneider took offense when Patrick Goldstein of the Los Angeles Times listed this year's Best Picture nominees and wrote that they were 'ignored, unloved, and turned down flat by most of the same studios that . . . bankroll hundreds of sequels, including a follow-up to Deuce Bigalow: Male Gigolo, a film that was sadly overlooked at Oscar time because apparently nobody had the foresight to invent a category for Best Running Penis Joke Delivered by a Third-Rate Comic.' Schneider retaliated by attacking Goldstein in full-page ads in Daily Variety and the Hollywood Reporter. In an open letter to Goldstein, Schneider wrote: 'Well, Mr. Goldstein, I decided to do some research to find out what awards you have won. I went online and found that you have won nothing. Absolutely nothing. No journalistic awards of any kind. . . . Maybe you didn't win a Pulitzer Prize because they haven't invented a category for Best Third-Rate, Unfunny Pompous Reporter Who's Never Been Acknowledged by His Peers. . . .' Schneider was nominated for a 2000 Razzie Award for Worst Supporting Actor, but lost to Jar-Jar Binks. But Schneider is correct, and Patrick Goldstein has not yet won a Pulitzer Prize. Therefore, Goldstein is not qualified to complain that Columbia financed Deuce Bigalow: European Gigolo while passing on the opportunity to participate in Million Dollar Baby, Ray, The Aviator, Sideways, and Finding Neverland. As chance would have it, I have won the Pulitzer Prize, and so I am qualified. Speaking in my official capacity as a Pulitzer Prize winner, Mr. Schneider, your movie sucks."… (meer)

alle leden

▾Leden

Onlangs toegevoegd door

trojanmiss, WALindemann, RobertLLucas, cdaley, tombomp, glitterfly, VALIS666, MeisterKleister, jordan7hm

▾Trefwoorden

▾LibraryThing Aanbevelingen

▾Lijsten

Geen

▾Iets voor jou?

Bezig met laden...

Meld je aan bij LibraryThing om erachter te komen of je dit boek goed zult vinden.

▾Discussies (Over links)

Op dit moment geen Discussie gesprekken over dit boek.

» Zie ook 20 vermeldingen

▾Besprekingen door leden

datum ▼ | stemmen

Toon 5 van 5

A very moreish book - cause it's a collection of shortish reviews and they all make pretty easy reading, you just keep reading the next one. Only enjoyable if you like reading short reviews/summaries of bad films - it's exactly what it says on the tin - but great if you like that. The summaries are usually far more enjoyable than the film itself and although Ebert isn't a proper comedian, he's witty enough that I've laughed out loud quite a bit and smiled even more. Sometimes his moral and political judgements are very, very off (for example, his portrayal of a few films where women are constantly violent to men as men-hating... alas! he has no idea) and there are some reviews which aren't up to much - whether cause the film is so average or cause of Ebert's poor writing or hang-ups. It's definitely enjoyable if you like reading about bad movies but the quality is pretty variable. The great reviews are a lot of fun though. (

)

tombomp | Oct 31, 2023 |

This collection of movie reviews by film critic Roger Ebert concentrates on the turkeys, the stinkers, and the flops -- as one might expect from the title.

Best taken in small doses, the reviews take unerring aim at miscasting, plot failures, editing disasters, and atrocious performances. It might better have been organized along those lines, rather than simply set up in alphabetical order by title.

Ebert also has a tendency to wander off-topic, at least when reviewing movies he doesn't like. Occasionally he devotes more words to the director's last hit or a better film with a similar plot than he spends on the flick he's supposedly writing about.

Quibbles aside, movie fans will undoubtedly find opinions they agree with as well as those they disagree with. Less avid fans of the cinema will at least have a list of movies to avoid. And pretty well everyone will come away with a favorite quote about badness -- "This movie is eye candy for the blind", or "watching it is like taking a bus trip with someone who has needed a bath for a long time". My personal favorite was "the mystery is solved by stomping in thick-soled narrative boots through the squishy marsh of contrivance." (

)

LyndaInOregon | Jan 17, 2021 |

Roger Ebert's scathing reviews are hilarious. Even if I liked the movie he's trashing, it's fun to read his views. Battlefield Earth was a hated movie but for some reason I liked it. I don't understand why Ebert kept going on about how nasty the Psychlos looked. They're aliens, and they are evil. I'm sure personal hygiene ranks low with them. Otherwise that review was funny. (

)

lesindy | Nov 1, 2014 |

Ebert certainly had a way with words and the movies he chose to review were extremely easy to mock...so in that sense it was very enjoyable. In another sense it was disappointing to find that Ebert not only brought relentlessly middle-American sensibilities, knowledge and taste to the judgement of these movies as though this was an objective measure he also indulged too frequently in mocking the film because it was not accessible or pleasing to people just like him. (

)

mmyoung | May 9, 2013 |

I have been a longtime fan of Mr. Ebert's reviews. He is funny, brutal and makes sure that we don't waste our money on drivel churned out by the Hollywood. And he did the same in this book. Read this book if you want to have a good laugh and meanwhile consider yourself lucky that you are not working in Hollywood or it could have been you getting your ass reviewed somewhere in this book.

(

)

Veeralpadhiar | Mar 31, 2013 |

datum ▼ | stemmen

Toon 5 van 5

▾Gepubliceerde besprekingen

geen besprekingen | voeg een bespreking toe

▾Andere auteurs

» Andere auteurs toevoegen

▾Reeksen en verbanden tussen werken

Is opgenomen in

PELÍCULAS QUE NUNCA DEBERÍAS VER. Pero después de leer este libro tal vez lo hagas... door Roger Ebert

▾Prijzen en onderscheidingen

geschiedenis tonen

▾Algemene kennis

Je moet ingelogd zijn om Algemene Kennis te mogen bewerken.

Voor meer hulp zie de helppagina Algemene Kennis .

Gangbare titel

Oorspronkelijke titel

Alternatieve titels

Oorspronkelijk jaar van uitgave

2007

Mensen/Personages

Belangrijke plaatsen

Belangrijke gebeurtenissen

Verwante films

Motto

Opdracht

Eerste woorden

Citaten

Laatste woorden

Ontwarringsbericht

Uitgevers redacteuren

Auteur van flaptekst/aanprijzing

Oorspronkelijke taal

Gangbare DDC/MDS

Canonieke LCC

▾Verwijzingen

Verwijzingen naar dit werk in externe bronnen.

Wikipedia in het Engels

Geen

▾Boekbeschrijvingen

Roger Ebert's I Hated Hated Hated This Movie, which gathered some of his most scathing reviews, was a best-seller. This new collection continues the tradition, reviewing not only movies that were at the bottom of the barrel, but also movies that he found underneath the barrel. From Roger's review of Deuce Bigalow: European Gigolo (0 stars): "The movie created a spot of controversy in February 2005. According to a story by Larry Carroll of MTV News, Rob Schneider took offense when Patrick Goldstein of the Los Angeles Times listed this year's Best Picture nominees and wrote that they were 'ignored, unloved, and turned down flat by most of the same studios that . . . bankroll hundreds of sequels, including a follow-up to Deuce Bigalow: Male Gigolo, a film that was sadly overlooked at Oscar time because apparently nobody had the foresight to invent a category for Best Running Penis Joke Delivered by a Third-Rate Comic.' Schneider retaliated by attacking Goldstein in full-page ads in Daily Variety and the Hollywood Reporter. In an open letter to Goldstein, Schneider wrote: 'Well, Mr. Goldstein, I decided to do some research to find out what awards you have won. I went online and found that you have won nothing. Absolutely nothing. No journalistic awards of any kind. . . . Maybe you didn't win a Pulitzer Prize because they haven't invented a category for Best Third-Rate, Unfunny Pompous Reporter Who's Never Been Acknowledged by His Peers. . . .' Schneider was nominated for a 2000 Razzie Award for Worst Supporting Actor, but lost to Jar-Jar Binks. But Schneider is correct, and Patrick Goldstein has not yet won a Pulitzer Prize. Therefore, Goldstein is not qualified to complain that Columbia financed Deuce Bigalow: European Gigolo while passing on the opportunity to participate in Million Dollar Baby, Ray, The Aviator, Sideways, and Finding Neverland. As chance would have it, I have won the Pulitzer Prize, and so I am qualified. Speaking in my official capacity as a Pulitzer Prize winner, Mr. Schneider, your movie sucks."

▾Beschrijvingen bibliotheek

Geen bibliotheekbeschrijvingen gevonden.

▾Beschrijving door LibraryThing leden

Boekbeschrijving

Haiku samenvatting