Klik op een omslag om naar Google Boeken te gaan.
Bezig met laden... The Hoax of the Twentieth Centurydoor A.R. Butz
Top Five Books of 2020 (282) Bezig met laden...
Meld je aan bij LibraryThing om erachter te komen of je dit boek goed zult vinden. Op dit moment geen Discussie gesprekken over dit boek. geen besprekingen | voeg een bespreking toe
With his book Hoax of the Twentieth Century, A. R. Butz, Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, was the first (and so far the only) writer to treat the entire Holocaust complex from the Revisionist perspective, in a precise scientific manner. This book exhibits the overwhelming force of historical and logical arguments which Revisionism had accumulated by the middle of the 70s. It was the first book published in the US which won for Revisionism the academic dignity to which it is entitled. It continues to be a major revisionist reference work, frequently cited by prominent personalities. This new edition comes with several supplements adding new information gathered by the author over the last 25 years. Because of its prestige, no library can forbear offering The Hoax of the Twentieth Century, and no historian of modern times can ignore it. A 'must read' for every Revisionist and every newcomer to the issue who wants to thoroughly learn about revisionist arguments. Geen bibliotheekbeschrijvingen gevonden. |
Actuele discussiesGeenPopulaire omslagen
Google Books — Bezig met laden... GenresDewey Decimale Classificatie (DDC)940.53History and Geography Europe Europe 1918- World War IILC-classificatieWaarderingGemiddelde:
Ben jij dit?Word een LibraryThing Auteur. |
I couldn't do it, I couldn't get through it. It is written incredibly poorly. The publisher left practically no margins in the book, and they incorrectly show how they quote long portions of others work (printing it smaller instead of further indents). I understand they are on a budget and they feel they have important information to get out, but it made it nearly unreadable.
On that the documentation is poor, like the most challenging claims seem to have no thing to back them up and the boring stuff are way over documented. ( )