Klik op een omslag om naar Google Boeken te gaan.
Bezig met laden... Negative beneficence and positive beneficence: Being parts V & VI of The principles of ethics (His System of synthetic philosophy, v.9, pt. V-VI)door Herbert SpencerGeen Bezig met laden...
Meld je aan bij LibraryThing om erachter te komen of je dit boek goed zult vinden. Op dit moment geen Discussie gesprekken over dit boek. geen besprekingen | voeg een bespreking toe
Geen bibliotheekbeschrijvingen gevonden. |
Actuele discussiesGeen
Google Books — Bezig met laden... GenresGeen genres WaarderingGemiddelde:
Ben jij dit?Word een LibraryThing Auteur. |
"Beyond certain general sanctions incdirectly reffered to in the verification, there are only here and there, and more especially in the closing chapters, conclusions evolutionary in origin that are additional to, or different from, those which are current."
"Some such result might have been foreseen. Right regulation of the actions of so complex a being as Man, living under conditions so complex as those presented by a society, evidently forms a subject-matter unlikely to admit of definite conclusions throughout its entire range."
This is so sensible, I sometimes wonder why there are not more Spencer readers.
But then I look at the prose. This is not simple writing. Nor is it hard to follow. It is careful, and sober. It demands intelligence. And that, I think, is where most readers today object. They don't want to use their intelligence in this way, simply to follow the words of his long, stately sentences.
As for me, I think is it near-perfect. I try not to emulate it, in my own writing. But I often do follow his cadences, his rhythms.
As for the argument? There's much to pick at, I suppose, but I find his treatment of justice more problematic. Early in this book he makes the distinction between justice and beneficence, and he argues for a strict apartheid between them. I agree. The argument is important. Indeed, it is probably worth a whole book even to itself.
That being said, Spencer here proves himself to be an astute and sober fellow with something to offer those who think they "know it all" when it comes to ethics. None of us do. And none of us should assume that because we are smart fellows, our superior intelligence will change the world.
Spencer puts that to rest early on, too! ( )