![](https://image.librarything.com/pics/fugue21/magnifier-left.png)
![](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/P/0253347580.01._SX180_SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg)
Klik op een omslag om naar Google Boeken te gaan.
Bezig met laden... Negotiating with the Enemy: U.S.-China Talks During the Cold War, 1949-1972door Yafeng Xia
Geen Bezig met laden...
![]() Meld je aan bij LibraryThing om erachter te komen of je dit boek goed zult vinden. Op dit moment geen Discussie gesprekken over dit boek. geen besprekingen | voeg een bespreking toe
""A very good attempt to give a coherent and consistent account of the China-U.S. contacts during the Cold War.... [R]eaders will certainly gain a better understanding of this interesting and intricate history."" -- Zhou Wenzhong, Chinese Ambassador to the United StatesFew relationships during the Cold War were as dramatic as that between the United States and China. During World War II, China was America's ally against Japan. By 1949, the two countries viewed each other as adversaries and soon Geen bibliotheekbeschrijvingen gevonden. |
Actuele discussiesGeen
![]() GenresDewey Decimale Classificatie (DDC)327.7305109Social sciences Political Science International Relations North America United States U.S.-Asian Relations U.S.-China RelationsLC-classificatieWaarderingGemiddelde:![]()
Ben jij dit?Word een LibraryThing Auteur. |
Most importantly was the cultural assumptions that each brought. Having vastly different world views, each saw their positions as naturally reasonable and were surprised when the other side disagreed. Domestic politics also undermined each side's ability to compromise. To complicate matters further, neither side understood the other's political process so they were less understanding of the other's domestic considerations. In addition, individual actors made a difference. If George Marshall had arrived in China prior to Hurley's mission, the US might have regained the trust of both sides.
This is a good survey of a difficult period. Xia uses American sources from the USG and some Chinese documents (which were necessarily more limited because of the PRC's more restrictive classification process). He also looks at a large amount of Chinese language secondary sources and memoirs, which would be difficult for most American scholars to access. Nevertheless, his impressive research did not lead to substantial new understandings. Instead, he provides a strong survey of the events and decisions with only limited interpretation. (