Klik op een omslag om naar Google Boeken te gaan.
Bezig met laden... Social Limits to Growth (1977)door Fred Hirsch
Geen Bezig met laden...
Meld je aan bij LibraryThing om erachter te komen of je dit boek goed zult vinden. Op dit moment geen Discussie gesprekken over dit boek. geen besprekingen | voeg een bespreking toe
The promise of economic growth which has dominated society for so long has reached an impasse. In his classic analysis, Fred Hirsch argued that the causes of this were essentially social rather than physical. Affluence brings its own problems. As societies become richer, an increasing proportion of the extra goods and services created are not available to everybody. Material affluence does not make for a better society. Fred Hirsch's classic exposition of the social limits to growth manages to connect many of the apparently disparate factors that blight modern life: alienation at work and deteriorating cities as well as inflation and unemployment. Geen bibliotheekbeschrijvingen gevonden. |
Actuele discussiesGeenPopulaire omslagen
Google Books — Bezig met laden... GenresDewey Decimale Classificatie (DDC)301.5Social sciences Social Sciences; Sociology and anthropology Sociology and anthropology Formerly: InstitutionsLC-classificatieWaarderingGemiddelde:
Ben jij dit?Word een LibraryThing Auteur. |
Still, I think this is a very provocative challenge to laissez-faire economics and to the idea that economic growth is the be-all and end-all of economic policy. Hirsch argues that in advanced industrial societies a positional economy has surpassed a materialistic economy. Rather than worrying about obtaining basic necessities of life (material goods), we strive to obtain positional goods whose utility depends on other people NOT using them, owing to either congestion or just snobbery. Hirsch argues that Adam Smith's notion that if everyone pursues their individual ends everyone's well-being will be increased was applicable to the nascent industrial age, but now it doesn't work. He says that in our post-materialistic age we actually need collective means to satisfy individual ends.
He also talks about how capitalism has depended on people sharing some kind of common moral foundation but that pervasive pursuit of self-interest has eroded this moral foundation--I'm not sure how much he needs this to support central thrust.
The book was published in 1976 and I would be interested to see what the libertarian/pro-free market response has been. ( )