Afbeelding van de auteur.

Thomas Albert Sebeok (1920–2001)

Auteur van The Sign of Three. Peirce, Holmes, Dupin

81+ Werken 610 Leden 5 Besprekingen Favoriet van 1 leden

Over de Auteur

Thomas A. Sebeok is Distinguished Professor Emeritus of Linguistics and Semiotics at Indiana University.

Reeksen

Werken van Thomas Albert Sebeok

Myth: A Symposium (1955) 97 exemplaren
Style in Language (1964) 42 exemplaren
Current trends in linguistics (1966) 10 exemplaren
Global Semiotics: (2001) 9 exemplaren
The Sign and Its Masters (1979) 7 exemplaren
Speaking of apes : a critical anthology of two-way communication with man (1980) — Redacteur; Redacteur — 6 exemplaren
Spoken Finnish (1977) 5 exemplaren
Spoken Hungarian (1945) 5 exemplaren
Sight, sound, and sense (1978) 3 exemplaren
How Animals Communicate (1977) 3 exemplaren
The @semiotic web 1986 (1987) 1 exemplaar
Jakobson [acrylic] 1 exemplaar
Estilo del lenguaje (1974) 1 exemplaar
Semiotic Prologues (2008) 1 exemplaar

Gerelateerde werken

Tagged

Algemene kennis

Gangbare naam
Sebeok, Thomas Albert
Geboortedatum
1920-11-09
Overlijdensdatum
2001-12-21
Geslacht
male
Nationaliteit
USA
Geboorteplaats
Budapest, Ungarn
Plaats van overlijden
Bloomington, Indiana, USA
Beroepen
Semiotiker
Relaties
Morris, Charles William (Lehrer)

Leden

Besprekingen

The Sign of the Three is not for the general reader. Only four stars, for some redundancy and some technical writing not of general interest. It is a series of essays regarding in large measure the formation of hypotheses; informed guesses leading to useful explanations. Dupin was Edgar Allen Poe's amateur detective who set the template for the Sherlock Holmes style of crime detection. Charles Sanders Peirce [sic], perhaps our best American philosopher, parsed methods of scientific investigation and general acquisition of knowledge, among much else.

Peirce realized that the formation of useful hypotheses, the fuel of scientific discovery and explanation in general, is neither formal induction nor deduction but rather what he termed abduction: informed and testable guesses. And whereas induction and deduction are subject to mathematically exact rules of formal logic, no formal rule can comprise useful abduction.

Finding and testing a provisional hypothesis does require the engines of induction and deduction: working out natural consequences implied or deducible from a hypothesis to discover whether those consequences comport with facts. If not, then the hypothesis is in error.

Arthur Conan Doyle let Holmes call his methods variously induction and deduction, but they were rather choosing from multiple hypotheses by eliminating the wrong ones by testing their various consequences. Poe called this ratiocination in the case of Dupin. Holmes's capacities appeared astonishing to Dr. Watson because Watson did not entertain the wealth of Holmes's hypotheses so as to recognize the significance of certain evident facts, nor the chain of their ramifications and of Holmes's testing of them, only to be revealed later. Of course, Holmes benefitted also from a personal fund of forensic facts, like the sources of all kinds of tobaccos, ability to recognize most perfumes, and where different types of dirt were found in London.

The Sherlock Holmes stories are a delight and a fast read. I read one in college and could not resist reading all the rest one weekend.

Peirce is a fine thinker and writer. Wikisource carries a free set of his quite readable and wryly humorous essays along the above lines at:
https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Popular_Science_Monthly/Volume_12/January_1878/Il... .
… (meer)
 
Gemarkeerd
KENNERLYDAN | 3 andere besprekingen | Jul 11, 2021 |
 
Gemarkeerd
Lior.Zylberman | Apr 11, 2020 |
The Sign of Three is a collection of ten essays about the detective methods of C. Auguste Dupin and Sherlock Holmes, the history of the forensic sciences, the diagnostic techniques of Sigmund Freud and Karl Popper's conjectural paradigm. The scientific method and many other methods and processes are discussed in the light of Charles S. Peirce's logic of discovery (i.e. making good guesses) or abduction as he called it. Peirce believed that we "conquer the truth by guessing, or not at all."
 
Gemarkeerd
jm34harvey | 3 andere besprekingen | Feb 18, 2012 |
This is series of essays compiled by Umberto Eco and Thomas Sebeok comparing the logic methods of Charles Peirce with the fictional Sherlock Holmes. Both are surprisingly similar. A very fascinating book, though it helps to have a basic familiarity with Peirce to fully appreciate it.
½
1 stem
Gemarkeerd
PaulMysterioso | 3 andere besprekingen | Jan 15, 2006 |

Misschien vindt je deze ook leuk

Gerelateerde auteurs

Statistieken

Werken
81
Ook door
10
Leden
610
Populariteit
#41,203
Waardering
4.2
Besprekingen
5
ISBNs
119
Talen
5
Favoriet
1

Tabellen & Grafieken