Claude Rawson
Auteur van The Essential Writings of Jonathan Swift [Norton Critical Edition]
Over de Auteur
Claude Rawson is Maynard Mack Professor of English, Yale University.
Werken van Claude Rawson
The Essential Writings of Jonathan Swift [Norton Critical Edition] (1742) — Redacteur; Medewerker — 80 exemplaren
Satire and Sentiment 1660-1830: Stress Points in the English Augustan Tradition (2000) 22 exemplaren
Henry Fielding and the Augustan Ideal Under Stress: Nature's Dance of Death and Other Studies (1972) 8 exemplaren
Order from Confusion Sprung: Studies in Eighteenth-Century Literature from Swift to Cowper (1985) 6 exemplaren
Politics and Literature in the Age of Swift: English and Irish Perspectives (Cambridge Studies in American) (2010) 5 exemplaren
Gulliver's Travels 1 exemplaar
Routledge Revivals: Gulliver and the Gentle Reader (1991): Studies in Swift and Our Time (2017) 1 exemplaar
Henry Fielding (1707-1754) : novelist, playwright, journalist, magistrate : a double anniversary tribute (2008) 1 exemplaar
Routledge Revivals: Henry Fielding and the Augustan Ideal Under Stress (1972): 'Nature's Dance of Death'… (2018) 1 exemplaar
English Satire 1 exemplaar
'The soft wanton god' in TLS 5033, 17 Sept 1999 [review of Love's 'Works of John Wilmot, Earl of Rochester'] 1 exemplaar
Focus: Swift 1 exemplaar
Gerelateerde werken
Tom Jones : de geschiedenis van een vondeling (1749) — Introductie, sommige edities — 8,133 exemplaren
Tagged
Algemene kennis
- Officiële naam
- Rawson, Claude Julien
- Geboortedatum
- 1935
- Geslacht
- male
Leden
Besprekingen
Misschien vindt je deze ook leuk
Gerelateerde auteurs
Statistieken
- Werken
- 26
- Ook door
- 7
- Leden
- 218
- Populariteit
- #102,474
- Waardering
- 4.2
- Besprekingen
- 1
- ISBNs
- 58
I enjoyed reading most of the entries in this book, and agreed with most of the inclusions of the book. Sometimes, however, I enjoyed the entry while thinking that the poet did not really belong in the volume. An example would be Emily Brontë: she is one of my favourite writers, and a very good poet in her own right, but as she had such a small output, I do not think she should have an entry of the same length as, say, Milton. Nothing misogynistic in that – I am glad that she is being shown some consideration, and I am also glad that Christina Rossetti found a place in the volume. All that I am saying is that some of the entries seemed a bit padded. Which raises the question, if Brontë can be included, why not Swinburne, Cowper, any of the war poets, etc.? I am not saying that they should be included, just that the inclusion (and exclusion) of some poets has the whiff of PC to it.
I did not agree with all of the entries, of course, especially the one that assigns a normative Christianity to Milton. It propounded the old chestnut (well, I view it as an old chestnut) that Milton employs Satan in Paradise Lost as an epic hero in order to teach the reader, by some sort of tortuous reverse-psychology, that Satan + pride = bad, and God + pious smugness = good. I just do not accept that reading of Paradise Lost, and therefore could not agree with the Milton essayist’s conclusions on Milton.
I also disagreed with the inclusion of Jonathan Swift. Swift is, for me, the greatest satirist in the English language, but he is a much better prose-stylist than a poet. The whole essay on Swift seems to be an apologia for the inclusion of him in the volume (at the expense of his friend, Pope, who is in the collection), and I just felt that it is a case of protesting too much on the behalf of the writer.
What I really enjoyed were the essays on writers that I only have a general idea about. This was especially true of Robert Browning, of whom I have only read shorter pieces. His best work, however, seems to have been his longer pieces, like The Ring and the Book. The essay on him has convinced me that I need to look into his work. I also liked the essays on the Romantics (no, Clare is not there), particularly the one on Shelley: his quest to become a true Renaissance man (yes, I realise that is an anachronism) by reading about and writing on as many topics as possible is truly inspiring.
So, a very stimulating collection, but not without its problems. I guess it is difficult to please everyone in a collection spanning the history of English literature from Chaucer to Philip Larkin. At least the collection motivated me to read more poetry over the coming months.… (meer)