![](https://image.librarything.com/pics/fugue21/magnifier-left.png)
![Heartless door Marissa Meyer](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/P/1250044650.01._SX180_SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg)
Klik op een omslag om naar Google Boeken te gaan.
Bezig met laden... Heartless (editie 2016)door Marissa Meyer (Auteur)
Informatie over het werkHeartless door Marissa Meyer
![]()
Bezig met laden...
![]() Meld je aan bij LibraryThing om erachter te komen of je dit boek goed zult vinden. Op dit moment geen Discussie gesprekken over dit boek. I quite like a tragic tale and reimagined fairytales, but all the focus on the baking early in the story made it drag. I understand it’s for character building, but I didn’t feel like it gave me any real insight into Catherine’s character. The story picked up about halfway through, and had a satisfying conclusion, which is why I gave it three stars. Representation: N/A? Trigger warnings: Blood, grief and loss depiction, sword violence, death of a boyfriend, forced marriage, war themes, animal attack Score: Six points out of ten. This review can also be found on The StoryGraph. A friend in real life recommended this to me which came from a familiar author since I've read many of her books like Cinder, Scarlet, Renegades, Archenemies, Gilded, Cursed so I picked it up and finally read it. When I finished it, I thought it was only okay and not at the same level as Scarlet but I've seen worse. It starts with the main character Catherine whose last name I don't know living in Wonderland (that sounds familiar but it is an Alice in Wonderland retelling after all.) The first few pages start the narrative slowly and that pace continues throughout most of it. Here's where the flaws surface, the worldbuilding isn't one of the strongest as it felt more like a world set in the 19th century with the Wonderland label slapped on than an actual setting. I couldn't fully connect to the characters either and unfortunately it's a common issue among Marissa Meyer's works but there are some that I could connect to (not in this novel though.) What frustrated me the most is that the author decided to name the villain the Jabberwocky but it isn't real. It's a poem. Not a creature. So why is it in here? She could've come up with any another name and instead she chose this one. Catherine is forced to marry the king so she becomes queen but she secretly starts a relationship with another significant protagonist, Jest (as I said earlier, I couldn't relate to any of them.) In the midst of that Catherine must go to a realm called Chess but I thought chess was a board game and not another kingdom interconnected with Wonderland. The ending was terrifying as Catherine thought she killed the Jabberwocky but instead she killed Jest due to an illusion from a person added in the for the sake of the story to move forward. Then after some bereavement Catherine turns into the well known Queen of Hearts concluding the book where Alice in Wonderland would pick up afterwards (there is also an afterword where the author gives an answer to the question of why is a raven like a writing desk.) geen besprekingen | voeg een bespreking toe
BevatWerd geïnspireerd doorPrijzenErelijsten
In this prequel to Alice in Wonderland, Cath would rather open a bakery and marry for love than accept a proposal from the King of Hearts, especially after meeting the handsome and mysterious court jester. Geen bibliotheekbeschrijvingen gevonden. |
Actuele discussiesGeenPopulaire omslagen
![]() GenresDewey Decimale Classificatie (DDC)813.6Literature English (North America) American fiction 21st CenturyLC-classificatieWaarderingGemiddelde:![]()
Ben jij dit?Word een LibraryThing Auteur. |
I love Origin Stories.
What I don't enjoy is the love trope that one character is wishy washy with their affections. I enjoy a good romance, but this I love you yet I'm going to brush you off and look down my nose at you so you are unsure of my feelings.
It was fun to see connections to all the original story and where they came from. Even the unexpected connection. They were like little desserts to the story.
I would say this is a borrow from the library book. I don't see myself rereading this. (