Klik op een omslag om naar Google Boeken te gaan.
Bezig met laden... The Simpsons and Philosophy: The D'oh! of Homerdoor William Irwin (Redacteur), Mark T. Conard (Redacteur), Aeon J. Skoble (Redacteur)
Geen Bezig met laden...
Meld je aan bij LibraryThing om erachter te komen of je dit boek goed zult vinden. Op dit moment geen Discussie gesprekken over dit boek. https://archidose.blogspot.com/2014/04/book-review-simpsons-and-philosophy.html El propio Homer Simpson afirma que «las series animadas no tienen significado profundo. Son sólo unos dibujos estúpidos para pasar el rato» (T03 E02). Con todo, este libro no sólo tiene mucho que decir sobre ese gran artefacto cultural de nuestro tiempo que es Los Simpson a entusiastas y detractores de la serie por igual, sino que es una introducción entretenida y al mismo tiempo rigurosa a la obra de pensadores como Aristóteles, Kant, Heidegger o Sartre, entre muchos otros. Disappointing I was not terribly impressed by this book. The problem is not that I'm not a fan of "The Simpsons"; I watch that show in reruns just about every day. The problem is not that I don't find philosophy interesting; I own about 40 books on philosophy and tend to spend a lot of my spare time reading them. I gave the first book in this series (_Seinfeld and Philosophy_) 4 stars. The authors of that book had meaningful things to say about the philosophical aspects of "Seinfeld", but they seemed to think it would be hilarious if they liberally and randomly inserted phrases like "not that there's anything wrong with that" into their essays, and that got old really quick. (To get an idea how annoying this can be, think of your acquaintances who can't seem to carry on a conversation without repeating dialogue from _Monty Python and the Holy Grail_.) In _The Simpsons and Philosophy_, the editors have managed to keep the cuteness under control, but the authors don't establish too many non-obvious connections between philosophy and the show. Part of the problem is that some of them don't seem to be very familiar with the program and with popular culture, in general. For example, the author of one essay asserts that Maude Flanders was killed at a football game and that the running character on the old Letterman show was the "equalizer guy", and seems unaware that the song "Jazzman" that was featured in the episode about the death of Bleeding Gums Murphy was an old Carole King hit. Another essay reveals the shocking fact that "The Simpsons" does not, to the essay's author's dismay, push a consistent Marxist agenda. Several of the essays make only tangential and superficial reference to the Simpsons. It's hard to suppress the impression that many of the authors are junior faculty members who jumped at the chance to pad their CV's by taking an old essay of theirs and dressing it up with token reference to the Simpsons. There is also an essay or two that reads like another Alan Sokal parody. geen besprekingen | voeg een bespreking toe
Onderdeel van de reeks(en)
Verwijzingen naar dit werk in externe bronnen. Wikipedia in het Engels (21)This unconventional and lighthearted introduction to the ideas of the major Western philosophers examines The Simpsons ? TV's favorite animated family. The authors look beyond the jokes, the crudeness, the attacks on society ? and see a clever display of irony, social criticism, and philosophical thought. The writers begin with an examination of the characters. Does Homer actually display Aristotle's virtues of character? In what way does Bart exemplify American pragmatism? The book also examines the ethics and themes of the show, and concludes with discussions of how the series reflects Geen bibliotheekbeschrijvingen gevonden. |
Actuele discussiesGeenPopulaire omslagen
Google Books — Bezig met laden... GenresDewey Decimale Classificatie (DDC)100Philosophy and Psychology Philosophy General PhilosophyLC-classificatieWaarderingGemiddelde:
Ben jij dit?Word een LibraryThing Auteur. |